![]() However, GTK+ 2.x is still fully supported as well, so users on any platform will get the same feature updates.īluefish is fundamentally designed to edit HTML source code, and attempts to make that experience as nice as possible. 2.2.0 introduced a number of important changes, starting with support for GTK+ 3, making it fit in better with GNOME 3 and recent Ubuntu Unity desktops. The new release is the 2.2.x series (as of right now, a bugfix release makes 2.2.1 the latest version). It is available through most distributions’ package managers, but if you have to install it from source, the dependencies are easily satisfied. Bluefish is GTK+-based and utilizes standard components from the GNOME platform, such as Pango and Cairo. ![]() But with that history comes stability, and the project has done an excellent job of keeping up to date with the ever-changing standards of web development and the evolving desktop Linux environment. Which one best suits your needs can depend heavily on the details of your content.īluefish has been actively developed since the late 1990s, which makes it an elder statesman compared to a lot of open source projects. Bluefish takes a programmer’s approach, while BlueGriffon is designed to provide as close to a WYSIWYG-design experience as is possible. Despite the similarity in names (not to mention the fact that both are designed to edit HTML, CSS, and JavaScript), the projects could hardly be less alike. Two major open source Web editors made releases in recent weeks: Bluefish and BlueGriffon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |